PrEP Care Continuum | Health Service Providers (N = 14) | WSWUD (N = 25) |
---|---|---|
Awareness | ||
Promotion Education/ Engagement | Many noted: 1. Public health campaigns and advertisements were not tailored to WSWUD 2. Substance use services were key to HIV prevention education for WSWUD | Most had knowledge about PrEP through social networks and substance use services, barriers included: 1. Lack of tailored messaging to WSWUD 2. Low HIV risk perceptions |
All felt PrEP education was important but noted the following competing priorities: 1. Survival 2. Substance use treatment | Incentives facilitated engagement in PrEP education | |
Uptake | ||
Evaluation/ Counseling Prescribing | All had counseling experience. 1. Note templates facilitated HIV risk assessments 2. Discomfort discussing sex work was a barrier 3. Injection drug use made phlebotomy challenging | Most had prior/current experience with PrEP/PEP: 1. Trust in care facilitated PrEP discussions 2. Stigma was a barrier to PrEP evaluations |
Providers had differing levels of comfort prescribing PrEP 1. Challenges with follow and adherence deterred initiating prescriptions | PrEP uptake was facilitated by: 1. Wrap-around substance use and HIV services 2. Same day PrEP | |
Adherence and Retention | Â | Â |
Counseling/ Follow-up Prescribing | Bridge clinic providers had less experience with PrEP adherence. Barriers to adherence across settings: 1. Lack of housing 2. Active substance use | Most WSWUD cited difficulty adhering to PrEP/PEP: 1. Competing survival priorities (drug use/safety) 2. Drug storage when unhoused For some, having a PrEP routine facilitated PrEP adherence |
Community outreach facilitated ongoing PrEP prescribing | Â |